Thursday, 28 February 2013

Mock means just as worrying as the real deal!


The nature of the Leicester Award for Employability was to improve my chances of getting a graduate position after university, which in my case would be a training contract within a law firm. My first experience of the application process for these positions came slightly earlier than I expected as I had been applying for Summer Vacation Placements. Luckily, the current Leicester Award task was aptly timed and very useful; we were required to apply for one of four jobs and then be interviewed for them.

Firstly, we were required to choose one of the four positions and send a request for information email as the advertisement stated. As I haven’t had much previous experience of applying for roles in such a way, I relied upon logic and what I thought would be the correct content and layout. I asked for the job description, person specification, application form and any other information using the job title and addressing the contact by name. However, from my feedback it was clear that I had missed some vital elements most notably that the job title alone is not sufficient, if a reference number is given ensure that is quoted in both the subject title and email content to guarantee the correct information is sent. Also, I was informed that using an email signature of my contact details is also helpful in case of any issues, which is something I have since create and stored on my email account.

Next, using the job description and person specification it was time to complete the application form which included a personal statement section which would be used to assess the selection criteria. When it comes to completing application forms I tend to complete the general form first including my personal details, previous work experience and education as I know these details and I find that by completing these first it appears to me that most of the form has been done. I then opened another document and imported in all the information which was highlighted as a selection criteria for the application form from the person specification and also the important information from the job description. I tried to match my experience to the key assessment areas and explain the use of my skills using the STAR (situation, task, action, result) technique. In total I think the completing the application form took between three to four hours over different days as I like to come back and reread sections with fresh eyes.

Instead of getting direct feedback for our application form we were instead treated to learning about the method by which many employers shortlist their application forms. The most shocking point I found whilst taking part in this activity was the lack of people proof reading their work and instead sending in a form with silly grammatical and spelling errors. I remember speaking to the Human Resources Manager of firm at the Leicester University Law Fair who said the most common rejection of application forms is if there are spelling and grammar errors; with some applicants even misspelling the name of the firm. We looked at different types of application forms used including personal statement forms and competency questions forms; the ones used most frequently by law firms. I learnt that the reasons for using the forms can vary but it is important in both that you not only adhere to any word limit but that you answer the question asked and use any information given to you. This is most useful when answering “why do you wish to join…?” as if you research the company and read the job description there will be characteristics and types of people they want to join their team such as ambition and drive. Since completing this exercise I have looked upon my answers to such questions in a different way and am critical of my own answers to ensure I give myself the best chance of getting through stage one of any application process.

The final part of this mock application process was the interview, which even though it is a mock interview for a fictitious job, I was still nervous. This may be as I treated it as if it was for a real position and therefore dressed accordingly because I believed that in order to improve my skills I needed feedback on a true representation of how I would act in an interview. My nerves did go away after the first couple of questions as I felt more comfortable within the situation and because I was happy with my ability to answer the questions asked even those I wasn’t expecting. My other main issue during interviews is how much to say in relation to a question as I am quite concise and to the point with my answers and sometimes I am unsure whether I have said enough.

The feedback I received from this interview though was very positive, which was a pleasantly surprised about given my concerns. My body language, eye contact and voice were good and made me seem confident and positive. The answers I gave were coherent, concise and used the STAR technique well linking in personal experiences and examples adequately to demonstrate skills and abilities. Overall I was said to be composed and impressive when interviewed, which was not the feedback I expected. Fortunately I was given a point to improve for future, research the role well so when asked by the interviewers for any questions, an impressive and informative question can be given which will make me memorable to the interviewer.

When looking back at the whole process I have learnt such a great deal about the process as a whole and importantly for me how the process is looked upon by those short listing applications and taking the interview as this helps me to think about my answers in future. I have started using all of the feedback given to me and will continue to do so in future applications. I will also ask other people look over my application to spot any errors I have made and to look critically over my answers noting whether I have demonstrated the skills appropriately as I feel that from my ability to interview well I need to make sure my application form is strong enough to get me to that stage of the process. However, the most important skill I have learnt throughout the whole of the Leicester Award process is the STAR technique; it allows me to demonstrate my skills and qualities in a way I had not previously used. I can only hope that this process will aide me in my dream of getting a vacation placement and training contract.

Wednesday, 27 February 2013

Presenting a PowerPoint Perfectionist’s Presentation


So with my careers research in pretty and organised diagrams, charts and tables it was important to put this to use and also analyse my experiences, skills and qualities and understand how these are important to my future career. The chance to do this came in the form a presentation I was required to give as part of the Leicester Award for Employability to my Leicester Award leader and my peers.
The title given was rather broad, “How your experiences to date, both work and study, relate to your future career plans” which allowed me to focus in on specific areas of my experiences although I found this part of presentation difficult as I had many different experiences which all had a diverse impact on my  journey towards a legal career. So I decided it was important to list all of my experiences and what I have learnt in order to realise which have the most importance and relevance to progress towards becoming a solicitor.
Next, I began to design my presentation slides using Microsoft PowerPoint with the idea of making something which would be interesting and memorable but wasn’t cluttered with too much text and over use of images. Whilst creating the slides I ensured that I was consistent with fonts, font sizes and colours, as I believe this to be an integral part of a good presentation; especially when you consider that the PowerPoint slides are a visual addition to the presentation. The slides should reflect your individualism but also allow you to talk around the points on the slides without dominating your presentation itself.
On the day I was meant to give my presentation I had a recurrence of pain from an operation and was unable to present on this day. Instead it was agreed that I would give my presentation at a later date but to as peer feedback is an excellent learning method I watched presentations given by other Leicester Award participants. Whilst watching the other presentations I began to notice my own faults in other people, especially increasing the speed in which I talk due to nerves. It also began apparent to me how quickly a five minute presentation is over and therefore how much information can successfully and adequately be spoken about in that time. It was apparent to me then that I needed to focus my presentation further on important experiences; quality of information over quantity.


AFTER
BEFORE
 
 







 
 
 
During the revision of my slides I reflected upon the constructive criticism given to other presenters to improve my slides. I recognised that I hadn’t narrowed down my ideas fully and therefore had too much information to present and also too much text on some of my slides, which would be detrimental to my overall presentation. I tried to incorporate things that had worked well for other presenters into my own slides and the delivery of my speech as there are elements of PowerPoint I had forgotten to use including slide transitions. The most important point I took away though was the necessity to read through the presentation and time it so I do not exceed the time limit.
When the day of my presentation arrived I was nervous as I always am before speaking publicly. However, I had learnt what was on each slide and how I would talk around the points instead of using a script as I wanted my present to flow well and enable me to add individual flare. This individualism was shown through my ability to explain my personal images and why I had used them within my presentation and also add humour when talking about my experiences. Unfortunately my nerves had caused me to increase the speed at which I spoke and I had therefore finished my presentation with 30 seconds remaining. In hinds sight I should have used the techniques I had been taught in the Student Life Talk training with the Ambassador scheme and I should have realised that this may happen and adjust my presentation accordingly.
I was surprised by the feedback as I felt my presentation did not go as well as I had hoped however I can be very critical of myself and my work. I was informed that my overall slides were well designed, good choice of colour and font, and had an appropriate amount of relevant images. My final informative slide however let me down as it had the potential to be a strong ending to my presentation but instead I read directly from the slide. My nerves were also noted not through my voice but by the speed at which I spoke, although my use of gesture, tone and humour worked well.
 

The feedback I was given has been fundamental in my approach to future presentations as any critique was constructive and my positives were highlighted so I now know where my strengths lie. My creation of PowerPoint slides is by far my strongest area, therefore it is important that when look to improve that is the delivery which would benefit most from enhancement. Ultimately my weakest area is letting my nerves affect my delivery and impact upon the presentation as a whole. The only way to conquer my nerves is to speak publicly more often, practice the specific presentation. Consequently, I am requesting to deliver the Student Life Talk when possible and I intend to join the Public Speaker Society or compete in the debating competition within the Law Society as these will improve my public speaking and allow me to develop other transferable skills